Impossible Siebel. Background. A common requirement amongst many Siebel customers, is to have the ability to run an asynchronous workflow under the real. This issue is highlighted in the following Oracle support web document, and is representative of the problems faced by many. NOTE 4. 94. 81. 5. Setting CREATEDBY to the user that invoked the workflow process asynchronously. Open Source Automation Tools For Siebel OpeningsTestautomatisierung Tools und Testwerkzeuge im Softwaretest und Qualittssicherung, Testautomatisierung von Experten fr Experten. Open Source Automation Tools For Siebel Open San Jose' title='Open Source Automation Tools For Siebel Open San Jose' />The customer stated that they have an asynchronous workflow, and wanted to know if it was possible to set the creator login. The solution offered by the support personnel was to run the work flow in synchronous mode. Asynchronous workflows are used in Siebel to offload work from the user session to perform background processing, however. SADMIN. This behavior obscures information about the creator. Workflows can be run synchronously as suggested in the Oracle support web document above, but it has the rather. UI. Fortunately, for customers who cant accept running background tasks synchronously, there is a viable solution, but it. To re affirm the requirement, we are going to walk through a solution that allows any workflow or business service in. Siebel to be run asynchronously, under the actual users credentials, and without actually supplying the password If we step back, and look at the problem from an architectural perspective, we know that when the user logs into the. Application and executes any type of code such as e. Script, or workflow, it will run synchronously. The only supported method to run code and avoid blocking the UI, is to run code under a background process, however any. SADMIN by default. The first challenge is to find a supported method to execute code in a background session under the current users. Experienced Siebel Integrators in the audience can probably guess, that we can achieve this with any Siebel API that. SSO, or utilize the inbuilt impersonation capability of certain Siebel components. The two most suitable choices are. Ive highlighted these particular interfaces, because both provide APIs that can be invoked from a background session. As an added. benefit, both of these APIs can be built to support load balancing for high availability. With a suitable SSO API identified, we have the necessary key piece required to solve the above problem. Solution Overview. The diagram below shows an overview of this proposed solution. The user triggers an asynchronous task from the current user session, and is allowed to continue with their work in the. In the background, A WFProc. TheINQUIRER publishes daily news, reviews on the latest gadgets and devices, and INQdepth articles for tech buffs and hobbyists. Mgr component on the server executes the process, and calls a bespoke service called. JLE Session Transport Service that acts as a wrapper for the transport. A synchronous call is invoked over the transport, using the Siebel API identified above. The Siebel API instantiates a new session on behalf of the real user, executes the destination business service, and. An important implementation aspect worth considering upfront, is designing a. API for the Siebel developer. The developer should be able to specify the desired subsystem, and the service. The following diagram shows how a facade is used for invoking the actual SSO interface. A standard Siebel business service is defined, so it can be substituted in any existing workflow, or hooked into any. Max Steel Filmes Download Gratis. Siebel trigger. The designer now has to implement the adapter code, and build the interface to communicate with the. SSO interface. The implementation of interfaces to these Siebel APIs are out of scope of this article, as it requires different spectrums of design. Depending on which SSO API is chosen, you may require an Integration specialist to implement a WSBS dispatch wrapper, or a. Siebel EAIJava specialist to implement the Siebel JDB bridge. Please consult with your Siebel Integration Architect for more localized implementation advice. Input Arguments. To support a plug and play design, I propose that all input arguments and child properties passed into this service would. Siebel including workflows. This design allows us to go into tools, and retrofit this capability to any business service, without redevelopment effort. It is also deliberately designed to avoid hierarchy changes required for the correct invocation of the destination business. To control the dispatch, lets define a custom child hierarchy, which contains 3 key elements. The user login to impersonate. The destination business service to dispatch to. The destination business method name. The diagram below illustrates the property set structure, with the required information to dispatch the call. This special Property. Set can sit at any index, however it should be removed before it is dispatched to the remote. Property. Set Serialization. Property. Sets are a Siebel proprietary representation of objects that only exist in memory. In order to send a Property. Set. out of Siebel, and receive it back in, it has to be serialized, de serialized, and potentially encoded to match transport. XML is usually used to transfer data between different systems, and Siebel provides methods to convert the Property. Set to. XML, and back, however a more efficient method is to utilize Siebels own Property. Set to text encoding format, or a utilise a. JSON parsing engine in e. Script. This minimizes the size of the message, results in less IO, and ensures that request is. Error Handling. This is the most critical aspect of the design, as every component in the design has to be proactive in handling, and. The caller is effectively making a synchronous requestresponse call between two sessions. Errors at the end of the chain. It is imperative that each component have guards in place to handle environmental, transport, and general unhanded. This can happen for a variety of reasons including. Component is offline. Component Maxed Task. Connection timeouts. Failed authentication. Out of resource. The Siebel JDB interface has OOTB capability with extra options for configuring, settings such as retry, and timeouts, to. Customers choosing the Siebel WS API will have to consider implementing the appropriate. Both the Siebel WS, Siebel JDB options can be configured for load balancing through virtual server definitions. This. capability allows this solution to scale easily. In practice this only works natively for the WS option, the JDB interface seems to only. An as alternative, the load balancing responsibility for the JDB interface can be offloaded to the SRProc component. Its important to understand the current expected load, and forecast the expected number of tasks that are needed. Every invocation can potentially spawn a new session, which could effectively double the amount of threads that the system has to. Maintaining Impersonation. One last consideration in this design, is that once the user dispatches the work flow to be picked up in the background, no. The impact is that the developer needs to ensure that all work flows are run inside the impersonated object manager. If a. server request is initiated, that would then dispatch to a server thread, breaking the impersonation for that particular thread. The above capability was designed and delivered for a customer who needed to meet regulatory audit requirements, to capture. CRUD operations across the application. In the past customers who needed to meet this requirement would have chosen to take a hit in performance, and kill. With a little bit of effort, Siebel customers now.